For some years A.R.E. Members and the organization itself have conducted expeditions in search of ruins or any remains of the lost continent of Atlantis. According to Cayce, Atlantis—located from the Gulf of Mexico to Gibraltar—was destroyed in a final catastrophic event circa 10,000 B.C. The focus of A.R.E. Efforts has been in the Bimini area, however, other related locations have also been investigated. Research on the so-called Bimini Road has been hampered as researchers are split on the origin of the structure: some believe it is a manmade road or foundation while others assert it is natural beach rock, which fractured in place. However, a seldom-discussed fact is that a portion of the Bimini Road was removed after a hurricane in 1926.
Before the end of the last Ice Age (12,000-years ago) the ocean levels were at least 300 feet below their current levels. A vast 'island' was in the area in those remote times rather than chains of islands. Edgar Cayce referred to Bimini as one of the mountaintops of ancient Atlantis. While few would consider the island a mountain, 12,000-years ago it was one of the highest points on the vast land formation in the region. Bimini and Andros Island, lying about 100 miles to the east of Bimini, were a part of the same island in 10,000 B.C.—called 'Poseidia' temple which sunk in 10,000 B.C. And is, according to Cayce, covered by 'the slime of ages.'
This record hall is identical to the one in Egypt under the Sphinx. Archaeologists have countered that the remains of civilization in the region only go back 7,000 years—or perhaps even less. They have asserted that if a major civilization existed in the area, some of its remains would be found on current land. That assertion has a fundamental flaw.
Ancient maritime civilizations typically built their cities and ports on the ocean shores. As related in prior issues of Ancient Mysteries, archaeologists working in South America, the Pacific coast of North America, India, and elsewhere in the world have been discovering the remains of underwater ruins. These ancient maritime civilizations built their cities and ports on coastlines—all of which have been covered by the rising oceans. Given the recent changes in North and South American archaeology—taking the history of habitation in the Americas to 50,000-years ago—it seems likely that ruins would lie in the shallow waters around Bimini. Andrew Collins—Gateway to Atlantis In August 2002, British researcher Andrew Collins renewed interest in the search for Atlantis with a stirring lecture at the Annual Egypt & Ancient Civilizations Conference at Virginia Beach. Collins' book, Gateway to Atlantis, proposes that the major remaining portions of Atlantis are in and around Cuba—especially in the area where possible underwater ruins were discovered in 2000.
Collins published this rather startling idea prior to the discovery of the possible ruins. Collins also discussed the possibility that Andros Island (between Bimini and Cuba) could hold ruins of Atlantis and he showed a variety of photos of underwater structures taken in the waters around Andros. Many of the photos were shot by J. Manson Valentine and several pilots in the 1960s, prior to the existence of GPS. Thus, several of the locations of the ruins have been lost. As reported in the A.R.E. Membership newsletter Ancient Mysteries, Collins found several of the original photos and Cuban articles in the Egerton Sykes' collection of the A.R.E.
Library during the conference week. Sykes was a world recognized authority on Atlantis who carefully evaluated all of the evidence on Atlantis as well as conducting his own expeditions until his death in 1983. All of his books, manuscripts, and research materials are housed in a secured area of the library. The articles, written in Spanish, were subsequently translated by A.R.E.
Trustee, Humberto Martinez, M.D., who read them to the audience. The articles detailed 1950s efforts to locate remains of Atlantis by Cuban archaeologists—all of which were subsequently suspended due to political changes. Nevertheless, the information pointed to the areas around Cuba—including Andros and Bimini—as probable sites of ruins. Our research of satellite images has uncovered a site in Cuba which fits all of Plato's statements about the center city. Cuban Underwater 'Ruins' May Be Concrete While we hope that the 'ruins' reported off the extreme western tip of Cuba are remnants of Atlantis, our research indicates that the formations lying on the 2100-foot bottom may be something else. This area lies near the locations of the Soviet-era guided missile bunkers and concrete platforms that were the critical issue in the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.
We believe that the materials on the bottom may be the remains of these bunkers and the storage silos which were quickly dismantled by the Soviets and dumped. Virtually no new information (2004) has been released about the Cuban site, but we remain hopeful that ruins may be identified at the location. Genetic & Archaeological Confirmations An additional piece of thoroughly scientific evidence pointing to the probably existence of Atlantis has recently been published in two books: Mound Builders (2001) and Ancient South America (2002).
Both books have been authored by Dr. Greg Little, John Van Auken, and Dr. In Mound Builders, the authors suggest that the technology many people associate with Atlantis may not be as advanced as thought. In addition, Van Auken and Lora Little's book, The Lost Hall of Records (2000), details finds associated with the migration of Atlanteans to Central America.
Updated information on recent archaeological discoveries and genetic evidence have been presented at the annual Ancient Mysteries conference. It has long been recognized that migration legends from natives in North, Central, and South America support the migration of advanced groups to various locations in the Americas corresponding to Cayce's accounts of Atlantis. In recent years, archaeological work has shown that Cayce's accounts of the Atlantean migrations to the Americas is consistent with the archaeological evidence. Now, however, research on a form of DNA recovered from ancient remains almost perfectly matches Cayce's account. This was an unexpected scientific surprise that appears to support the contention that Atlantis was in the Caribbean area. In particular, what is called 'Haplogroup X' by geneticists, has been found in ancient remains in every location in the world where the Cayce readings state Atlanteans fled at three different times (10,000 B.C., 28,000 B.C., and 50,000 B.C.). Amazingly, Haplogroup X—one of 42 major ancient mtDNA groups identified—has not been found in other locations of the world.
In addition, another DNA type, called Haplogroup B, appears to be from what Cayce and others have termed the ancient continent of Mu—or Lemuria. We were the first to make this assertion, which has since been embraced by many others. For additional information, see. S Satellite Imagery Research of Bimini In 2001 and 2002, the Edgar Cayce Foundation funded a 640-square km satellite imaging project in the area around Bimini. This research project was completed by Jonathan Eagle. This process allows for the identification of probable underwater structures. The project revealed two types of seemingly 'anomalous' formations.
Both of these have now been extensively investigated. The results are below:. 'Two' straight lines were seen off NE Bimini and the report to the A.R.E. Eagle suggested that the lines could be walls with sand dunes over them. In mid-2003, Greg and Lora Little visited the site of the lines and discovered that they were simply seaweed growing on the tops of sand channels. Locals were well aware of the sand channels.
Eagle and Bill Donato visited the lines in July of 2003 and also made the same finding. Eagle reported that he 'felt' a 'reverse thermocline' in the area—with cooler water on the surface. Eagle and Donato have suggested that the thermocline and sand channels may be due to some sort of volcanic activity which they say may be somehow connected to a vein of gold Cayce stated was on Bimini.
The National Geographic has sponsored an extensive study of the water flows around Bimini and found numerous areas where different temperatures mixed. The thermoclines around Bimini are due to warm water flows swirling with colder water flows. In October 2003, we viewed the large image of the 630 sq km satellite image of Bimini (now posted in the A.R.E. Library) and noted at least another dozen 'straight lines' to the NE of the two which were investigated.
We believe all of these are completely natural and not worthy of further attention, but a few other investigators have plans to visit the underwater lines at NE Bimini to investigate their possible relationship to the gold vein. Cara mengatasi adobe premiere expired. About a dozen circles off South Bimini were spotted by the satellite. We visited several of the smaller ones which we believe were formed by dredging and collecting of sand for the Bimini beach areas. Some of the smaller circles are apparently similar to the ones we found around Andros—all of which turned out to be natural. The largest circle at Bimini was 200-feet in diameter and was raised off the bottom like a mound. It had an intriguing appearance from the air.
The large circle was investigated by us several times. It was probably manmade, but it was caused by a load of modern building materials dumped at the location. A few of the smaller circles were 'scooped out' —these were apparently made by specialized dredgers using large sand-sucking tubes to collect sand for construction and new beach areas on Bimini. Locals were aware of this. Andros Five 2003 expeditions were conducted to Andros. The first expedition examined the underwater circles found off western Andros.
The second examined Rebikoff's 'e,' a strange e-shaped formation in shallow water in extreme northwestern Andros. During this expedition, an underwater 'anomaly' was found in North Andros. The third expedition examined this structure as well as visiting the circles at South Bimini. As stated above, the newest expeditions have been to Andros. The most recent information on Andros and Bimini, where the idea that both the Bimini Road and Andros Platform were ancient breakwaters enclosing harbors. One other intriguing possibility about the Bimini Road and Andros Platform exists, and it was suggested to us by archaeologists.
Both formations could have been large foundations for buildings. Near the Andros Platform, in water about 12-feet deep, is a large flat area. Lying on the bottom in that area are flat paving stones carefully fitted together.
The paving stones are all square and rectangular with the typical size about 2 by 3 feet. 2004 Andros Expeditions The 2003 expeditions found two important underwater structures at Andros and also found evidence of an ancient temple on the island. In 2004 the first expedition to Andros was made in June. It confirmed the presence of ancient building structures in central Andros and looked at more areas of the underwater platform. Additional expeditions are planned to several areas at and near Andros as well as to an underwater harbor off the Yucatan. These all took place.
In brief, an ancient Maya harbor, with a still-existing 1000-foot long breakwater was investigated at Isla Cerritos off Yucatan. The harbor and breakwater were made from slabs of cut beach rock. Piedras Negras—2004 Piedras Negras, Guatemala is the site of Edgar Cayce's third Hall of Records. (The other two being at Giza— under the Sphinx—and in the Bahamas. In April 2004, we made an A.R.E.-sponsored expedition to Piedras Negras carefully examining most of the ruins.
An 83-minute video documentary was made of this expedition. Andros-Bimini December 2004 In December 2004, we went again to Bimini and Andros, this time with a crew from The History Channel. At Bimini we obtained what may be the best footage ever taken of the Road.
We also investigated and filmed what is known as 'Proctor's Road,' just north of the Bimini Road. Proctor's Road is a straight line of stones extending from the shore toward the Bimini Road site. At the Andros Platform we discovered that the hurricanes had passed directly over the site. Much of the 1000-foot-long, three-tiered platform was under sand.
But the hurricanes moved huge amounts of sand from the inner harbor revealing a depth of at least 65 feet. Before the hurricane the harbor was only 25- 35-feet deep. The storms also revealed a deep channel leading into the harbor next to the end of the platform. The channel is cut through the reefs and the bedrock. Research revealed that the harbor has never been dredged and the channel was not cut in modern times. 2005 Bimini Andros Expedition In May 2005 a joint expedition was taken between the ARE Search for Atlantis team and archaeologist Bill Donato of The Atlantis Organization. A series of amazing discoveries were made during and after the expedition.
Results of lab testing of materials gathered on that expedition will be released at the 2005 Ancient Mysteries Conference in Virginia Beach. We also still plan on going to Cay Sal and Anguilla. Another possible trip is being planned to coastal Belize. 2007 Bimini Update In May and June of 2007, three separate expeditions were carried out in the Bahamas as part of the A.R.E.' S Search For Atlantis Project. The initial report from these expeditions, issued in July, detailed the discovery of several crashed planes, at least one of which was reported missing in the Bermuda Triangle. The second report, issued in August, summarized several unexpected discoveries at Bimini, which included what appear to be rectangular building foundations in 100-feet of water and the remains of a temple consisting of white marble materials.
A Un~break my. Free download mp3 lagu iwan fals doa pengobral dosa. Dm Gm Un~break my heart oh baby C A come back and say that you love me.
![]()
This report summarizes the finds made on and around Andros. Andros is the largest and most unexplored island in all of the Bahamas. North Andros lies about 150 miles East of Miami. The island is about 105-miles long and 35 miles wide at it widest point. As reported earlier, several land explorations were made on Andros along with numerous water explorations. Week long trips were made to Andros by Drs. Greg & Lora Little in both May and June 2007, both of which began with aerial surveys on portions of the Great Bahama Bank (GBB). The GBB is a massive expanse of a largely flat and shallow bottom extending for nearly 300 miles beginning north of Bimini to some distance south of Andros—just north of Cuba.
In general, the water depth of this area averages about 25 feet. During the last Ice Age, the entire GBB was well above sea level. The aerial surveys identified over 30 unusual, dark formations in shallow water on the GBB and the gps locations were taken on each from the air. All but one of these formations was then visited on water with North Andros serving as our base of operations. In addition, side-scan sonar was employed to explore wide areas around Andros and in other areas a remote underwater video camera was used to examine the bottom.
Findings at Underwater Dark Features on the Great Bahama Bank Thirty dark features (underwater formations) were visited on the Great Bahama Bank, some of which were nearly 50 miles offshore onto the GBB. Ship and plane remains found at some of these sites were detailed earlier. In general, about 75% of all the dark formations are associated with a variety of dumped materials as well as more curious artifacts. For example, one perfectly round white spot in the middle of a dark formation showed what appeared to be a portion of a huge metal anchor sticking up from the bottom.
This piece could not be moved by hand. Is the actual ship also buried there? We don't know, but the formation around the anchor is over 500-feet long. At other dark features we discovered dumped bombs, propane gas cylinders, appliances, and other debris. Bahamas fishermen often enhance a good fishing site by dumping materials to the bottom, thus increasing fish cover. But these formations were of marginal interest to us because our prime interest is in archaeological remains.
It has been suggested that these 'good fishing spots' may have formed initially because of 'something buried under the sand' that allowed the grass to form, however, without extensive excavations, this cannot be determined. Discovery of the Underwater “Joulter’s Wall” The most important archaeological find of the 2007 Andros expeditions was a stonewall found in shallow water off an island north of Andros. Numerous interviews with local residents of Andros were made during our trips. One resident told us about a huge, underwater wall that was located in shallow water on the small chain of islands known as Joulters Cays, about 7-miles North of Andros. Joulters is completely uninhabited, and data obtained during the past 20 years has shown that numerous hurricane driven tsunamis, 30-feet and higher walls of water, have swept across the islands. In the 1950s, an attempt was made to form a small community on the southern Joulters island, but it was soon abandoned when a hurricane destroyed the few small, wood-framed homes that had been built. All of Joulters is extremely shallow and boats with a draft of more than two feet simply cannot reach it.
However, the approach to the area where the wall is located is even shallower. From directions given by the local, we found the underwater wall with Eslie and Krista Brown. During the two trips to Andros, we spent four full days at this site, not only filming and photographing the entire 'wall,' but also exploring the islands from one end to the other. We had to enter the area during high tide as we sped over a mile of water only one-foot deep.
We found the wall exactly as described by the Andros resident. She related that she had seen it twice. The first time, in the early 1990’s, a large portion of the wall was intact and partially above water. She saw it the second time after a severe 1990’s hurricane and said that the eye of the hurricane hit that area and destroyed most of the wall and shoreline. The wall itself is actually located in a small, narrow bay between what appears to be two islands. The bay is 3-7-feet deep, depending on the tide, and has sharks coming in at high tide. From the bay, the wall extends diagonally away from the two islands into water that is one-to-four feet deep ending where sandbars are located and the bottom is barely covered by water.
About two miles further, through this shallow water, is the deep Tongue of the Ocean. The wall is primarily made from square and rectangular limestone blocks that range in length from 3-6-feet, a width of 2-3-feet, and a thickness of 6-inches to 3-feet—with some blocks far larger. The blocks are obviously cut and roughly dressed and rough tool marks are clearly visible on many. There are some smaller, cube-like stones, about a foot square, occasionally found in portions of the intact wall and in places on the bottom.
One area of the wall remains fairly intact and is found in water about 6-feet deep. Brushing the sandy bottom underneath the lowest tier of stones revealed more limestone blocks under the visible portion. How far down it extends is unknown. This section of the wall runs approximately 30-feet long and is formed by the massive blocks stacked on top of each other with 2-3 vertical layers of blocks visible. We found about 50 large stone blocks widely scattered in water around this intact portion as if they had been tossed around by huge waves.
Representation of the central tenet of the Orion Correlation Theory: the outline of the Giza pyramids superimposed over a photograph of the stars in Orion's Belt. The validity of this match has been called into question by Hancock's critics.
The Orion correlation theory (or Giza–Orion correlation theory) is a in alternative. It posits that there is a correlation between the location of the three largest of the and of the, and that this correlation was intended as such by the original builders of the Giza pyramid complex. The stars of Orion were associated with, the god of rebirth and afterlife by the ancient Egyptians. Depending on the version of the theory, additional pyramids can be included to complete the picture of the Orion constellation, and the river can be included to match with the galaxy. The theory was first published in 1989 in Discussions in Egyptology, volume 13. It was the subject of a bestseller, The Orion Mystery, in 1994, as well as a BBC documentary, The Great Pyramid: Gateway to the Stars (February 1994), and appears in some books. Contents.
History The Orion correlation theory was put forward by in 1983. One night, while working in, he took his family and a friend's family up into the sand dunes of the for a camping expedition. His friend pointed out, and mentioned that, the dimmest and most westerly of the stars making up, was offset slightly from the others. Bauval then made a connection between the layout of the three main stars in and the layout of the three main pyramids in the.
He published this idea in 1989 in the journal Discussions in Egyptology, volume 13. The idea has been further expounded by Bauval in collaboration with Adrian Gilbert ( The Orion Mystery, 1994) and (, 1996), as well as in their separate publications.
The basis of this theory concerns the proposition that the relative positions of three main pyramids on the were by design correlated with the relative positions of the three stars in the of which make up Orion's Belt— as these stars appeared in 10,000 BC. Their initial ideas regarding the alignment of the Giza pyramids with Orion ('the three pyramids were a terrestrial map of the three stars of Orion's belt'—Hancock's, 1995, p. 375) are later joined with speculation about the age of the (Hancock and Bauval, published 1996, and in 1997 in the U.S. As The Message of the Sphinx).
According to these works, the Great Sphinx was constructed c. 10,500 BC , and its -shape is maintained to be a definitive reference to the of. Furthermore, the orientation and dispositions of the Sphinx, the Giza pyramids and the relative to one another on the ground is put forward as an accurate reflection or 'map' of the constellations of Leo, Orion (specifically, ) and the respectively.
As Hancock puts it in 1998's The Mars Mystery (co-authored with Bauval).we have demonstrated with a substantial body of evidence that the pattern of stars that is 'frozen' on the ground at Giza in the form of the three pyramids and the Sphinx represents the disposition of the constellations of Orion and Leo as they looked at the moment of sunrise on the spring equinox during the astronomical 'Age of Leo' (i.e., the epoch in which the Sun was 'housed' by Leo on the.) Like all this was a 2,160-year period. It is generally calculated to have fallen between the dates of 10,970 and. The allusions to dates circa 12,500 years ago are significant to Hancock since this is the era he seeks to assign to the advanced progenitor civilization, now vanished, but which he contends through most of his works had existed and whose advanced technology influenced and shaped the development of the world's known civilizations of antiquity. And maintain that available evidence indicates that the Giza pyramids were constructed during the period (3rd millennium BC ), while the exact date of the Great Sphinx is still unclear. Hancock does not dispute the dating evidence for the currently existing pyramids, but instead argues that they may have been an architectural evolution of sites whose origin and cultural significance dated back some eight thousand years before the current monuments were built —since the Orion correlation theory argues they are oriented that way—which, it is implied, provides further evidence for the influence of astronomical, mathematical, and historical knowledge that might not have been passed down to the pyramids’ builders. Critique Arguments made by Hancock, Bauval, Anthony West, and others concerning the significance of the proposed correlations have been critiqued. Among these are critiques from two, of in Los Angeles and of the, South Africa.
Using equipment, Krupp and Fairall independently investigated the angle between the alignment of Orion's Belt and north during the era cited by Hancock, Bauval, et al. (which differs from the angle seen today or in the third millennium BC, because of the ). They found that the angle was somewhat different from the 'perfect match' thought to exist by Bauval and Hancock in the Orion Constellation Theory. They estimate 47–50 degrees per the planetarium measurements, compared to the 38-degree angle formed by the pyramids.
Krupp pointed out that the slightly bent line formed by the three pyramids was deviated towards the north, whereas the slight 'kink' in the line of Orion's Belt was deformed to the south, and to match them up one or the other of them had to be turned upside-down. Indeed, this is what was done in the original book by Bauval and Gilbert (The Orion Mystery), which compares images of the pyramids and Orion without revealing that the pyramids’ map had been inverted.
Krupp and Fairall find other problems with their arguments, including noting that if the Sphinx is meant to represent the constellation of, then it should be on the opposite side of the Nile (the 'Milky Way') from the pyramids ('Orion'), that the c. 10,500 BC was in and not Leo, and that in any case the constellations of the originate from Mesopotamia and were completely unknown in Egypt until the much later Graeco-Roman era.
Ed Krupp repeated this 'upside down' statement in the BBC documentary Atlantis Reborn (1999). Bauval stated that some astronomers including of the have rejected Krupp's argument. Krupp presented a counterpoint to the objections, that Bauval stated had been made by the late Dr. Roy, who was a professor Emeritus of Astronomy at Glasgow University (including the accusation that Bauval and Gilbert deliberately inverted the pyramid map).
In a ruling by the (UK), the committee ruled in favour of Robert Bauval that Krupp's statement that maps were placed upside down was 'unfairly' presented in the BBC documentary Atlantis Reborn, without including Bauval's filmed response. Bauval and Hancock's filmed responses to Krupp's statements were included in the modified version of the documentary Atlantis Reborn Again shown on 14 December 2000. Andrew Collins and Rodney Hale have proposed an 'alternative correlation theory' using three bright stars in the. They argued that not only did the groundplan fit the sky but also the stars can be observed setting down on the corresponding pyramids.Their proposal has also been contested. Leo and the Sphinx. The The is a colossal statue with the face of a man and the body of a.
Carved out of the surrounding bedrock, it is 57 metres (187 ft) long, 6 metres (20 ft) wide, and has a height of 20 metres (66 ft), making it the largest single-stone statue in the world. The Great Sphinx is one of the world's largest and oldest statues, yet basic facts about it such as the real-life model for the face, when and why it was built, and by whom, are debated. These questions have collectively earned the title ', a nod to its Greek namesake, although this phrase should not be confused with the original. The Great Sphinx is commonly accepted by Egyptologists to represent the likeness of King (also known by the Hellenised version of his name, Chephren) who is often credited as the builder as well. This would place the time of construction somewhere between 2520 BC and 2494 BC. Because the limited evidence giving provenance to Khafra is ambiguous, the idea of who built the Sphinx, and when, continues to be the subject of debate.
An argument put forward by Bauval and Hancock to support the Orion Correlation Theory is that the construction of the Great Sphinx was begun in; that the Sphinx's -shape is a definitive reference to the of; and that the layout and orientation of the Sphinx, the and the are an accurate reflection or 'map' of the constellations of Leo, (specifically, Orion's Belt) and the, respectively. A date of 10,500 BC is chosen because they maintain this is the only time in the when the was and when that constellation rose directly east of the Sphinx at the. They also suggest that in this epoch the angles between the three of Orion's Belt and the horizon were an 'exact match' to the angles between the three main Giza pyramids. These propositions and other theories are used to support the overall belief in an advanced and ancient, but now vanished, global progenitor. The theory that the Sphinx is actually far older has received some support from. Most famously, has argued that the effects of water on the Sphinx and its surrounding enclosure mean that parts of the monument must originally have been carved at the latest between 7000–5000 BC. Schoch's analysis has been broadly corroborated by another geologist, David Coxill, who agrees that the Sphinx has been heavily weathered by rainwater and therefore must have been carved in pre-dynastic times.
A third geologist, has suggested a date only several hundred years prior to the commonly accepted date for construction. These views have been almost universally rejected by mainstream Egyptologists who, together with a number of geologists including James Harrell, Lal Gauri, John J. Sinai, and Jayanta K. Bandyopadhyaym, stand by the conventional dating for the monument.
Their analyses attribute the apparently accelerated wear on the Sphinx variously to modern industrial pollution, qualitative differences between the layers of limestone in the monument itself, scouring by wind-borne sand, or temperature changes causing the stone to crack. References. ^ Alexandra Bruce (2009). The Oxford Guide: Essential Guide to Egyptian Mythology, Edited by Donald B.
Redford, p302-307, Berkley, 2003,. Mackenzie, Donald A.
Egyptian Myth and Legend. Retrieved 2012-12-07.
Beneath The Pyramids Andrew Collins Pdf Files
Robert Bauval, Adrian Gilbert, The Orion Mystery: Unlocking The Secrets of the Pyramids (London: Heinemann, 1984). Adrian Gilbert (2001). ^ Hancock, Graham; Bauval, Robert; Grigsby, John. Retrieved 27 July 2016. (January 21, 2004) (2006) The Seven Wonders.
2007-08-24 at the. ^ Fairall, A. (1 June 1999). 'Precession and the layout of the ancient Egyptian pyramids'. Astronomy & Geophysics.
40 (3): 3.4–3.4. ^ Krupp, E.C. (February 1997). 'Pyramid marketing schemes'. Sky & Telescope. Bauval, Robert; Gilbert, Adrian Geoffrey (Aug 16, 1994). Retrieved 27 July 2016.
^ Krupp, Ed (2002). The Antiquity of Man. Retrieved 2006-08-08. Seymour, Percy (1998). The Birth of Christ: Exploding the Myth.
Hale R, Collins A., A Study of the Simple Geometrical Relationship of the Main Monuments of Giza and a Possible Connection to Stars, Archaeological Discovery Vol.04 No.02(2016),. Orofino, V. & Bernardini, P. Archaeoastronomical Study of the Main Pyramids of Giza, Egypt: Possible Correlations with the Stars?, Archaeological Discovery, 4, 1-10., The Secrets of the Sphinx: Restoration Past and Present, page 24 (Columbia University Press, 1999). British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 27 February 2015. Schoch, Robert (1999).
Archived from on August 28, 2009. Retrieved February 27, 2015. Lal Gauri, John J. Sinai, and Jayanta K.
Bandyopadhyay, 'Geologic Weathering and Its Implications on the Age of the Sphinx'. Geoarchaeology, Vol. 2 (April 1995), pp. 119–133. James A. Harrell, 'The Sphinx Controversy: Another Look at the Geological Evidence,' KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt, Vol.
2 (Summer 1994), pp. External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to. by. by John A.R.
Legon. by E.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |